How to get people to turn on their cameras

As you’ve probably realised, distributed working isn’t going away any time soon. The new normal is hybrid, with some people in offices, some working from home, and others in all sorts of random places.

And as everyone adjusts, one important question is still being asked. “How do I get people to turn on their cameras in meetings?”

The thing is, for meeting leaders and facilitators, life is hugely easier when everyone has their camera on. For a start, it’s the biggest single factor in keeping people focussed on the meeting, rather than multitasking. Plus, instant visual feedback is continuously available – just as it would be for an in-the-room meeting. You can see whether people are interested, agreeing/disagreeing, have questions or whatever, which makes it possible to respond in the moment.

But to get reluctant people to turn on their cameras, the fact that it’s good for the leader or facilitator just isn’t enough. There are potentially quite significant barriers to overcome:

  • Desire to multitask (don’t underestimate this. People are super busy)
  • Not feeling ‘camera ready’, either personally or workspace-wise. Not everyone has a private home office with good lighting!
  • Bandwidth can be a genuine issue in some places, especially on the move or in countries where data is expensive.

To get people to turn on their cameras, we may need to address the specific, individual barriers that they face. That probably means talking about it, one-on-one.

There’s a big diversity and inclusion issue involved. Women, black people and disabled people are less likely to turn on their cameras than white men, because they are more likely to be impacted by the barriers mentioned above. Let’s do the work to fix that.

And, in those one-on-one calls, be ready to let them know what’s in it for them to turn on their cameras.

What’s in it for them to turn on their cameras?

I like to mention some or all of the following:

  • Greater satisfaction. The research shows that people are much more likely to rate a meeting as successful if they’ve actively participated in it. And people are much more likely to actively participate if their camera is on.
  • Grab the wheel. People with cameras on are providing instant visual feedback to others on the call, who are likely to respond. So the people with cameras on have more influence over the direction of the meeting than those without. Camera on gives you more chance of getting what you, specifically, want from the meeting.
  • Getting heard. On calls with a mix of cameras-on and cameras-off participants, the people with cameras off are called on to speak less often, and later, than those with cameras on. If you want to be heard, you need to be seen.
  • Long-term prospects. People tend to like, and to trust, those they see frequently more than those they don’t. That’s going to be true of the people who have influence over the next steps in your career – assignments, promotions etc. So make sure they see you in meetings!
  • Diversity and inclusion. There’s a real possibility that white men will became proportionally more visible in this new world of hybrid work. By putting your camera on, you can be part of the solution!

What have you found to be successful in getting people to turn on their cameras? Please comment below.

8 thoughts on “How to get people to turn on their cameras”

  1. Thanks, this is useful. I hadn’t thought of talking to people 121. I do a lot of work with people in Africa with bandwidth problems, but there may be other issues.

  2. Rasmus Rasmussen

    Thanks Judy! Whats in it for them feels important for sure and at same time I realize it is kind of cloudy for me. The points mentioned makes perfect sense for me but I am not sure what my colleagues would say. A former colleague told me about one french study that told the opposite, meetings are less effective with cameras on… (I havent read it). Would you know any surveys or studies that could confirm? That could be helpful.

    Regards
    Rasmus

  3. @Rasmus Clearly some kinds of meetings don’t need cameras on, and can be more effective without. But a lot of the research that’s out there is a bit jumbled, with no clear definitions of different kinds of meetings, and/or is sponsored by tech providers making it pretty meaningless (as they find what they wanted to find)

    Meeting scientist Joe Allen is the best person to look up, and his book https://www.joeallen.org/suddenly-virtual brings a bunch of this stuff together

    I’d love to know what your colleagues do say when you talk to them more about this

  4. Excellent article Judy – really appreciate the “what’s in it for them” approach.

    Something else (I think I learnt from you?) is:
    * be really clear in the invite that it’s a cameras on event
    * when welcoming people, politely enquire if their camera is off, e.g. “Hi Judy, good to hear your voice…. we can’t see you yet, I don’t know if that’s deliberate?”

  5. “bosses” needs to monitor the “workers” who in turn (surprise) gets fatigued. Quite sad… Have we not reach further than this? For sure something to address. Thanks for the article!

Comments are closed.